Wednesday, February 28, 2007
What age should children have phonological awareness skills?
During first grade the child will learn to isolate the last sound in the word and may begin to segment familiar words into the individual sounds. By the end of second grade a child should be segmenting all sounds into individual sounds and delete beginning or ending sounds and tell the remaining word. The second grade child will also be expected to perform all of these tasks with sound cluster (i.e. ‘st’, ‘ft’, ‘sk’ etc.)
Tuesday, February 27, 2007
The phonological awareness skills
- Syllabification and rhyming as discussed above are the first skills
- Blending sounds into words such as “f--i---sh” is “fish”
- Isolating the beginning or ending sounds in a word i.e. “fish” starts with “f” “boat” ends with “t”
- Segmenting words into sounds i.e. “what sounds are in the word ‘dish’-d—i—sh”
- Deleting the beginning or ending sound and telling what word remains i.e. “say ‘beat’ now say it again without the ‘b’---eat
Sunday, February 25, 2007
Phonological Awareness
The development of phonological awareness begins during the preschool years. It is not unusual for a child of 4 years to be able to tell a syllable of a word when ask to “tell me a little bit of telephone.” Even though she does not know the word syllable, she will say “tel” or “a” or “phone” in response to this request. By 5 years it is not unusual for a child who has been exposed to rhyme to detect a rhyme, that is she will fill in the missing rhyming word in a familiar rhyme. Also by 5 years, most children have memorized poems or finger plays which is also a part of phonological awareness development.
Saturday, February 24, 2007
Comparison
- One of many possible sounds in the languages of the world.
- The smallest identifiable unit found in a stream of speech.
- Pronounced in a defined way.
- Represented between brackets by convention.
Example: [b], [j], [o]
A phoneme is …
- A contrastive unit in the sound system of a particular language.
- A minimal unit that serves to distinguish between meanings of words.
- Pronounced in one or more ways, depending on the number of allophones.
- Represented between slashes by convention.
Example: /b/, /j/, /o/
Friday, February 23, 2007
Phoneme
Phonologists have differing views of the phoneme. Following are the two major views considered here:
- In the American structuralist tradition, a phoneme is defined according to its allophones and environments.
- In the generative tradition, a phoneme is defined as a set of distinctive features.
Thursday, February 22, 2007
Examples (English)
Here is an example of an application of lexical phonology:
Here are the words to be considered in this example:
- sane [sejn] / sanity [sQnIti]
- neighbor [nejb«&u0279;] / neighborhood [nejb«&u0279;hUd] *[nQb«&u0279;hUd]
The following rule applies across level 1 morpheme boundaries:
- A tense vowel becomes lax when a short word is lengthened by adding a suffix, so that the words ends up having at least three syllables.
Katamba 1989 139
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
Bracket erasure convention
Example:
Here is an example of the bracket erasure convention. The brackets in pressurize are erased before it enters Level II.
Level I
[press] [-ure] [-ize]
+sfx
[press] [-ure]
+sfx
[[[press] [-ure]] [-ize]]
Level II
[re-] [pressurize] (Bracket erasure)
+pfx
[[re-] [pressurize]]
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
The first two levels of affixation
Level 1
Affixes include:
-ate, -ion, -ity, -ic, sub-, de-, in-
Affixation causes stress shift:
photograph/photographic
Trisyllabic shortening occurs:
divine/divinity
Nasal assimilation occurs:
in + legal -> illegal
Affixes may attach to stems:
re-mit, de-duce
Affixation is less productive and more exception ridden.
Level 2
Affixes include:
-ly, -ful, -some, -ness, re-, un-, non-
Affixation does not affect stress:
revenge/revengeful
No trisyllabic shortening occurs:
leader/leaderless
Nasal assimilation is blocked:
un + ladylike -> unladylike, not *ulladylike
Affixes attach only to words:re-open, de-regulate
Affixation is more productive and less exception ridden.
Monday, February 19, 2007
Lexical phonology Levels
- Level 1: Class 1 derivation, irregular inflection
- Level 2: Class 2 derivation
- Level 3: Compounding
- Level 4: Regular inflection
Sunday, February 18, 2007
Lexical phonology Components
The following are crucial components of lexical phonology:
Lexical and post-lexical rules
Lexical rules …
Apply only within words.
Are prone to exceptions.
Require morphological information.
Must be structure-preserving.
Will not be blocked by pauses.Apply first.
Post-lexical rules …
Apply within words or across word boundaries.
Do not have exceptions.
Require syntactic information, or no grammatical information at all.
Are not necessarily structure-preserving.
Can be blocked by pauses.
Apply later.
Saturday, February 17, 2007
Lexical phonology Discussion
Friday, February 16, 2007
Lexical phonology
The lexicon plays a central, productive role in the theory. It consists of ordered levels, which are the domain for certain phonological or morphological processes.
Wednesday, February 14, 2007
Example (metrical tree)
On the word and foot level, s and w indicate relative stress. The w indicates weaker prominence, and the s indicates relative stronger prominence.The internal syllable structure in the above figure has been omitted and is represented by triangles. Within the syllable, s and w refer to stronger and weaker degrees of sonorance, not stress, and s corresponds to the syllable nucleus, which is the most sonorant segment in a syllable.In metrical trees, the strongest unit of the word is the one that is dominated by s all the way up the tree.
Tuesday, February 13, 2007
Metrical phonology
Monday, February 12, 2007
Multi-dimensional representations
Sunday, February 11, 2007
Segmental phonology
As a result, the phonological processes may influence more than one vowel or consonant at a time.
Saturday, February 10, 2007
Models of phonology
- In classical phonemics, phonemes and their possible combinations are central.
- In standard generative phonology, distinctive features are central. A stream of speech is portrayed as linear sequence of discrete sound-segments. Each segment is composed of simultaneously occurring features.
- In non-linear models of phonology, a stream of speech is represented as multidimensional, not simply as a linear sequence of sound segments. These non-linear models grew out of generative phonology:
o autosegmental phonology
o metrical phonology
o lexical phonology
SIL International
Friday, February 9, 2007
Phonology and phonetics
Is the basis for further work in morphology, syntax, discourse, and orthography design.
Analyzes the sound patterns of a particular language by
• determining which phonetic sounds are significant, and
• explaining how these sounds are interpreted by the native speaker.
Phonetics …
Is the basis for phonological analysis.
Analyzes the production of all human speech sounds, regardless of language.
Thursday, February 8, 2007
Phonology
Phonology is the study of how sounds are organized and used in natural languages.
The phonological system of a language includes
- an inventory of sounds and their features, and
- rules which specify how sounds interact with each other.
Phonology is just one of several aspects of language. It is related to other aspects such as phonetics, morphology, syntax, and pragmatics.
Here is an illustration that shows the place of phonology in an interacting hierarchy of levels in linguistics:
Wednesday, February 7, 2007
Development of the field
The Polish scholar Jan Baudouin de Courtenay coined the word phoneme in 1876, and his work, though often unacknowledged, is considered to be the starting point of modern phonology. He worked not only on the theory of the phoneme but also on phonetic alternations (i.e., what is now called allophony and morphophonology). His influence on Ferdinand de Saussure was also significant.
Prince Nikolai Trubetzkoy's posthumously published work, the Principles of Phonology (1939), is considered the foundation of the Prague School of phonology. Directly influenced by Baudouin de Courtenay, Trubetskoy is considered the founder of morphophonology, though morphophonology was first recognized by Baudouin de Courtenay. Trubetzkoy split phonology into phonemics and archiphonemics; the former has had more influence than the latter. Another important figure in the Prague School was Roman Jakobson, who was one of the most prominent linguists of the twentieth century.
In 1968, Noam Chomsky and Morris Halle published The Sound Pattern of English (SPE), the basis for Generative Phonology. In this view, phonological representations (surface forms) are structures whose phonetic part is a sequence of phonemes which are made up of distinctive features. These features were an expansion of earlier work by Roman Jakobson, Gunnar Fant, and Halle. The features describe aspects of articulation and perception, are from a universally fixed set, and have the binary values + or -. Ordered phonological rules govern how this phonological representation (also called underlying representation) is transformed into the actual pronunciation (also called surface form.) An important consequence of the influence SPE had on phonological theory was the downplaying of the syllable and the emphasis on segments. Furthermore, the Generativists folded morphology into phonology, which both solved and created problems.
In the late 1960s, David Stampe introduced Natural Phonology. In this view, phonology is based on a set of universal phonological processes which interact with one another; which ones are active and which are suppressed are language-specific. Rather than acting on segments, phonological processes act on distinctive features within prosodic groups. Prosodic groups can be as small as a part of a syllable or as large as an entire utterance. Phonological processes are unordered with respect to each other and apply simultaneously (though the output of one process may be the input to another). The second-most prominent Natural Phonologist is Stampe's wife, Patricia Donegan; there are many Natural Phonologists in Europe, though also a few others in the U.S., such as Geoffrey Pullum. The principles of Natural Phonology were extended to morphology by Wolfgang U. Dressler, who founded Natural Morphology.
In 1976 John Goldsmith introduced autosegmental phonology. Phonological phenomena are no longer seen as one linear sequence of segments, called phonemes or feature combinations, but rather as some parallel sequences of features which reside on multiple tiers.Government Phonology, which originated in the early 1980s as an attempt to unify theoretical notions of syntactic and phonological structures, is based on the notion that all languages necessarily follow a small set of principles and vary according to their selection of certain binary parameters. That is, all languages' phonological structures are essentially the same, but there is restricted variation that accounts for differences in surface realizations. Principles are held to be inviolable, though parameters may sometimes come into conflict. Prominent figures include Jonathan Kaye (Linguist), Jean Lowenstamm, Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Monik Charette, John Harris, and many others.
In a course at the LSA summer institute in 1991, Alan Prince and Paul Smolensky developed Optimality Theory—an overall architecture for phonology according to which languages choose a pronunciation of a word that best satisfies a list of constraints which is ordered by importance: a lower-ranked constraint can be violated when the violation is necessary in order to obey a higher-ranked constraint. The approach was soon extended to morphology by John McCarthy and Alan Prince, and has become the dominant trend in phonology. Though this usually goes unacknowledged, Optimality Theory was strongly influenced by Natural Phonology; both view phonology in terms of constraints on speakers and their production, though these constraints are formalized in very different ways.
Monday, February 5, 2007
Change of a phoneme inventory over time
Sunday, February 4, 2007
Phonemic distinctions or allophones
The /t/ sounds in the words 'tub', 'stub', 'but', and 'butter' are all pronounced differently (in American English at least), yet are all perceived as "the same sound", therefore they constitute another example of allophones in English.
Another example: in English and many other languages, the liquids /l/ and /r/ are two separate phonemes (minimal pair 'life', 'rife'); however, in Korean these two liquids are allophones of the same phoneme, and the general rule is that [r] comes before a vowel, and [l] does not (e.g. Seoul, Korea). A native speaker will tell you that the [l] in Seoul and the [r] in Korean are in fact the same sound. What happens is that a native Korean speaker's brain recognises the underlying phoneme /l/, and, depending on the phonetic context (whether before a vowel or not), expresses it as either [r] or [l]. Another Korean speaker will hear both sounds as the underlying phoneme and think of them as the same sound. This is one reason why most people have a marked accent when they attempt to speak a language that they did not grow up hearing; their brains sort the sounds they hear in terms of the phonemes of their own native language.
Saturday, February 3, 2007
Phoneme inventories
The vowels of modern (Standard) Arabic and (Israeli) Hebrew from the phonetic point of view. Note that the two circles are totally separate—none of the vowel-sounds made by speakers of one language are made by speakers of the other.
Part of the phonological study of a language involves looking at data (phonetic transcriptions of the speech of native speakers) and trying to deduce what the underlying phonemes are and what the sound inventory of the language is. Even though a language may make distinctions between a small number of phonemes, speakers actually produce many more phonetic sounds. Thus, a phoneme in a particular language can be pronounced in many ways.
Looking for minimal pairs forms part of the research in studying the phoneme inventory of a language. A minimal pair is a pair of words from the same language, that differ by only a single sound, and that are recognized by speakers as being two different words. When there is a minimal pair, the two sounds represent separate phonemes.
Friday, February 2, 2007
Avoiding Confusion from Orthographical Ambiguity, the IPA
The writing systems of some languages are based on the phonemic principle of having one letter (or combination of letters) per phoneme and vice-versa. Ideally, speakers can correctly write whatever they can say, and can correctly read anything that is written. In practice, this ideal is more nearly achieved in some languages than in others. In the writing systems of many languages, different spellings can be used for the same phoneme (e.g. English: "rude" /ɹu:d/ and "food" /fu:d/ have the same medial vowel sound but that sound is represented differently in each word), and the same letter (or combination of letters) can represent different phonemes. For instance, the letter combination "th" is used in English to represent /θ/ in "thin" /θɪn/ and /ð/ in "this" /ðɪs/, or the "c" of European Spanish represents /θ/ in "gracias" ['gra.θi.əs] (thank you) or /k/ in "cabo" ['ka.bo] (cape). In order to avoid confusion based on orthography, phonologists represent sounds by writing them in a phonetic alphabet which ascribes rigorous characteristics to each symbol. This system of writing is called the International Phonetic Alaphabet, it is used universally amongst people who require accurate descriptions of phonetic material, and is often referred to as the IPA.
IPA symbols are sometimes written between two slashes: " / / " (but without the quotes) as a way to denote what is minimally distinctive in a particular language (phonemes). On the other hand, a representation of the actual sounds produced by a speaker is enclosed by square brackets: " [ ] " (again, without quotes). This notation is used to convey a transcription of what sounds were produced in a particular instance of speech. For example, our English grammar will include a phoneme /p/ that will be realized as [p] or [pʰ] in a particular act of speech. Remember, whether a particular speaker produces [p] or [pʰ] is unimportant to meaning in the case of English (a listener only has to distinguish /p/ from /d/ or any other English phoneme which is minimally distinctive). nonetheless, the case of aspirated [p] could be interesting to linguists for many other reasons.